Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The civil suit names defendants, including Minerva Food and Drink (d/b/a as Scorpion’s Bar and Grill), the Sigma Chi fraternity (local and national) and seven of their fraternity brothers.
[needs update] [171] Prosecutors declined to charge the fraternity president, stating that a group hike on a hot day with inadequate water supply did not fit the traditional definition of hazing. They argued that hazing deaths are usually the result of excessive alcohol consumption, drugs or physical injury inflicted by fraternity members, and ...
More than a month after the Reddit post, right-wing sites and influencers publicized the photo, claiming it shows a Haitian immigrant stealing geese in Springfield. [61] The Ohio Department of Natural Resources was inundated with phone calls from people who believed the misinformation, and it became associated with the larger pet-eating hoax. [61]
Late UNH student Vinny Lirosi's mother sues Scorpion’s Bar, Sigma Chi fraternity and several frat brothers. Here are details of allegations. Mother's lawsuit: UNH student who died after going ...
However, social critic Caitlin Flanagan interviewed Penn State hazing victims and discovered the ‘Shep Test’ includes a fake branding ceremony in which fraternity members shout out the name of false idols, along with eating goldfish and walking through the fraternity house basement near-naked. The ‘Shep Test’ also includes mind games ...
Grisly video has emerged of a blood-soaked woman after she was allegedly caught killing and eating a cat in Ohio — but she’s neither a Haitian migrant nor anywhere near Springfield.
A video that appears to show several people chugging milk until they eventually spew liquid onto a University of Miami student is evidence of hazing and could have been much worse, said the author ...
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Doughney, 263 F.3d 359 (4th Cir. 2001), was an Internet domain trademark infringement decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The ruling became an early precedent on the nature of domain names as both trademarked intellectual property and free speech.