enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Red wave in Texas appellate courts, two flipped in Democratic ...

    www.aol.com/red-wave-texas-appellate-courts...

    Of Texas’ 15 appellate courts, each has a chief justice and between 3 and 13 justices that rule on cases; 83 justices serve statewide overall. Republicans swept races in five courts

  3. Two more Texas wins in court: sweeping small business ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/two-more-texas-wins-court-182900407.html

    (The Center Square) – The state of Texas has two more wins in court, in a sweeping small business federal regulatory action that a federal judge ruled is unconstitutional and a federal agency ...

  4. Ruiz v. Estelle - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruiz_v._Estelle

    United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas: Full case name: David Resendez Ruiz v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections : Decided: 1980 (original report) Citations: 503 F. Supp. 1265 (S.D. Tex. 1980), 550 F.2d 238: Case history; Prior action: Handwritten petition filed by David Resendez Ruiz in 1972 ...

  5. Texas Restaurant Owner Appeals $5,000 Fine For Starting ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/2012-02-06-texas-restaurant...

    A Texas restaurateur is asking the state Supreme Court to review a lower court ruling that let stand a $5,000 fine levied ... Texas Restaurant Owner Appeals $5,000 Fine For Starting Gay Rumor.

  6. Pearson v. Chung - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearson_v._Chung

    Pearson v. Chung, also known as the "$54 million pants" case, is a 2007 civil case decided in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia in which Roy Pearson, then an administrative law judge, sued his local dry cleaning establishment for $54 million in damages after the dry cleaners allegedly lost his pants.

  7. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Department_of...

    Case history; Prior: 608 F.2d 563 (vacated and remanded): Holding; In a Title VII discrimination claim, the ultimate burden of persuasion remains with the plaintiff throughout the trial; a shift to a defendant's burden is merely an intermediate evidentiary burden requiring the defendant to sustain only the burden of production, not the burden of persuasion.

  8. Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Department_of...

    The Inclusive Communities Project is a Texas-based non-profit organization that helps low-income families obtain affordable housing. [5] In 2008, they filed suit against the Texas agency responsible for administering these tax credits, claiming it disproportionately allocated too many tax credits "in predominantly black inner-city areas and too ...

  9. Marijuana user cannot be banned from gun ownership, US court ...

    www.aol.com/news/marijuana-user-cannot-banned...

    A U.S. appeals court on Wednesday ruled that a pot-smoking gun owner in Texas cannot be prosecuted for violating a federal ban on users of illegal drugs owning firearms, saying it is ...