enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: court order violation mn statute of limitations breach of contract arkansas

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Borrowing statute - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borrowing_statute

    A borrowing statute, is a statute under which a U.S. state may "borrow" a shorter statute of limitations for a cause of action arising in another jurisdiction. The purpose of borrowing statutes is to prevent plaintiffs from engaging in forum shopping in order to find the longest available statute of limitations.

  3. Breach of contract - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breach_of_contract

    Any breach of contract (warranty, condition or innominate term) gives rise to a right in the hands of the innocent party to recover their damage suffered which caused by the breach of contract by the defaulting party. Damages in the UK are the only [4] remedy available for breach of a warranty.

  4. Statute of limitations - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statute_of_limitations

    A civil statute of limitations applies to a non-criminal legal action, including a tort or contract case. If the statute of limitations expires before a lawsuit is filed, the defendant may raise the statute of limitations as an affirmative defense to seek dismissal of the claim. The exact time period depends on both the state and the type of ...

  5. Legal malpractice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_malpractice

    Under U.S. law, in order to rise to an actionable level of negligence (an actual breach of a legal duty of care), the injured party must show that the attorney's acts were not merely the result of poor strategy, but that they were the result of errors that no reasonably prudent attorney would make. While the elements of a cause of action for ...

  6. Tortious interference - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tortious_interference

    Inducing a breach of contract was a tort of accessory liability, and an intention to cause a breach of contract was a necessary and sufficient requirement for liability; a person had to know that he was inducing a breach of contract and to intend to do so; that a conscious decision not to inquire into the existence of a fact could be treated as ...

  7. Conflict of laws in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_of_laws_in_the...

    In one of the earliest cases in this area, Home Insurance Co. v. Dick, 281 U.S. 397 (1930), the Court held that the state of Texas could not constitutionally apply its own rule invalidating contract clauses that required any statute of limitations under two years to a contract that had no relation to Texas beyond the fact that the plaintiff was ...

  8. Specific performance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specific_performance

    Specific performance is an equitable remedy in the law of contract, in which a court issues an order requiring a party to perform a specific act, such as to complete performance of a contract. [1] It is typically available in the sale of land law, but otherwise is not generally available if damages are an appropriate alternative.

  9. Rotkiske v. Klemm - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotkiske_v._Klemm

    Klemm, 589 U.S. ___ (2019), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the statute of limitations under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act of 1977. The Court ruled that the statute of limitations begins one year after the alleged FDCPA violation took place, not one year after the violation was discovered by the ...

  1. Ad

    related to: court order violation mn statute of limitations breach of contract arkansas