Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Then P(n) is true for all natural numbers n. For example, we can prove by induction that all positive integers of the form 2n − 1 are odd. Let P(n) represent " 2n − 1 is odd": (i) For n = 1, 2n − 1 = 2 (1) − 1 = 1, and 1 is odd, since it leaves a remainder of 1 when divided by 2. Thus P(1) is true.
Constructive proof. In mathematics, a constructive proof is a method of proof that demonstrates the existence of a mathematical object by creating or providing a method for creating the object. This is in contrast to a non-constructive proof (also known as an existence proof or pure existence theorem), which proves the existence of a particular ...
Filip Saidak gave the following proof by construction, which does not use reductio ad absurdum [15] or Euclid's lemma (that if a prime p divides ab then it must divide a or b). Since each natural number greater than 1 has at least one prime factor , and two successive numbers n and ( n + 1) have no factor in common, the product n ( n + 1) has ...
Aperiodic tiling with "Tile(1,1)". The tiles are colored according to their rotational orientation modulo 60 degrees. [1] ( Smith, Myers, Kaplan, and Goodman-Strauss) In plane geometry, the einstein problem asks about the existence of a single prototile that by itself forms an aperiodic set of prototiles; that is, a shape that can tessellate space but only in a nonperiodic way.
Macbeth is using Lean to teach students the fundamentals of mathematical proof with instant feedback. [16] In 2021, a team of researchers used Lean to verify the correctness of a proof by Peter Scholze in the area of condensed mathematics. The project garnered attention for formalizing a result at the cutting edge of mathematical research. [17]
Only one mathematical proof by Fermat has survived, in which Fermat uses the technique of infinite descent to show that the area of a right triangle with integer sides can never equal the square of an integer. [1] This result is known as Fermat's right triangle theorem. As shown below, his proof is equivalent to demonstrating that the equation
Gorenstein and Lyons's proof for the case of rank at least 4 was 731 pages long, and Aschbacher's proof of the rank 3 case adds another 159 pages, for a total of 890 pages. 1983 Selberg trace formula. Hejhal's proof of a general form of the Selberg trace formula consisted of 2 volumes with a total length of 1322 pages.
Gödel's completeness theorem. The formula (∀ x. R (x, x)) → (∀ x ∃ y. R (x, y)) holds in all structures (only the simplest 8 are shown left). By Gödel's completeness result, it must hence have a natural deduction proof (shown right). Gödel's completeness theorem is a fundamental theorem in mathematical logic that establishes a ...