Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
I'm entitled to my opinion (or I have a right to my opinion) is an informal fallacy in which someone dismisses arguments against their position as an attack on one's right to hold their own particular viewpoint. [1] [2] The statement exemplifies a red herring or thought-terminating cliché.
Instead, there are facts, opinions, facts about opinions, and opinions about opinions. We must not present a fact as an opinion, nor an opinion as a fact; and so on for the other categories. Besides, truth is a boolean value (100% true or 100% false) only in certain technical contexts, such as mathematics or programming languages. In most other ...
Fallacies are used in place of valid reasoning to communicate a point with the intention to persuade. Examples in the mass media today include but are not limited to propaganda, advertisements, politics, newspaper editorials, and opinion-based news shows. [15]
The corresponding conditional of a valid argument is a logical truth and the negation of its corresponding conditional is a contradiction. The conclusion is a necessary consequence of its premises. An argument that is not valid is said to be "invalid". An example of a valid (and sound) argument is given by the following well-known syllogism:
It proves difficult to achieve the common good when conflict abounds and it is hard to agree upon what we have in common.
For critiques of Wikipedia's reliability for readers, see Wikipedia:Why Wikipedia is not so great. For information on citing Wikipedia as a source in an academic setting, see Wikipedia:Citing Wikipedia.
Opinion: Economies around the globe offer examples of policies that improve peoples' lives and others that don't. Why can't we talk about what works.
This explains, for example, why arguments that are accidentally valid are still somehow flawed: because the arguer himself lacks a good reason to believe the conclusion. [9] The fallacy of begging the question, on this perspective, is a fallacy because it fails to expand our knowledge by providing independent justification for its conclusion ...