enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. McCoy v. Louisiana - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCoy_v._Louisiana

    McCoy v. Louisiana, 584 U.S. 414 (2018), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held the Sixth Amendment guarantees a defendant the right to decide that the objective of his defense is to maintain innocence at all costs, even when counsel believes that admitting guilt offers the defendant the best chance to avoid the death penalty.

  3. Barker v. Wingo - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barker_v._Wingo

    Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, specifically the right of defendants in criminal cases to a speedy trial. The Court held that determinations of whether or not the right to a speedy trial has been violated must be made on a case-by-case basis ...

  4. Blakely v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blakely_v._Washington

    Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), held that, in the context of mandatory sentencing guidelines under state law, the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial prohibited judges from enhancing criminal sentences based on facts other than those decided by the jury or admitted by the defendant.

  5. Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixth_Amendment_to_the...

    The Supreme Court has applied all but one of this amendment's protections to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Sixth Amendment guarantees criminal defendants nine different rights, including the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury consisting of jurors from the state and district in ...

  6. Johnson v. Zerbst - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson_v._Zerbst

    Case history; Prior: 92 F.2d 748 (5th Cir. 1937): Holding; Since the Sixth Amendment constitutionally entitles one charged with crime to the assistance of counsel, compliance with this constitutional mandate is an essential jurisdictional prerequisite to a federal court's authority to deprive an accused of his life or liberty.

  7. Escobedo v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escobedo_v._Illinois

    Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964), is a United States Supreme Court case holding that criminal suspects have a right to counsel during police interrogations under the Sixth Amendment. [1] The case was decided a year after the court had held in Gideon v. Wainwright that indigent criminal defendants have a right to be provided counsel at ...

  8. A Tennessee State University That Nearly Expelled a Student ...

    www.aol.com/news/tennessee-state-university...

    The 6th Circuit noted the Supreme Court's June 2021 decision in Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L., which held that a Pennsylvania public school violated the First Amendment when it suspended a ...

  9. Erlinger v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erlinger_v._United_States

    Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case relating to the right to a jury trial in criminal cases under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. The case was argued on January 16, 2024, and decided on June 21.