Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This page was last edited on 13 January 2025, at 18:13 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.
Mafart and Prieur v Television New Zealand Ltd; Eastern Services Ltd v No 68 Ltd; C v Complaints Assessment Committee; Condon v R; Shirley v Wairarapa District Health Board; Steele and Roberts v Serepisos; Chirnside v Fay; Chamberlains v Lai; Secretary for Justice (as the New Zealand Central Authority on behalf of T J) v H; Henkel KgaA v ...
The Court of Appeal reversed the High Court's earlier award of $25,000 in general damages, as MAF owed a duty of care to the agriculture industry, and the public in general and not to Bell-Booth. This article relating to case law in New Zealand is a stub .
On 1 December 2022, The New Zealand Herald released the results of its own exclusive poll which found that 21% of respondents supported lowering the voting age to 16 years, whilst 79% opposed it. Polling reveals that support for lowering the voting age is the highest at 31% in 18–24-year-olds, with support decreasing in older age brackets up ...
The New Zealand Council of Law Reporting (NZCLR) is an incorporated body charged with overseeing the publication of the NZLR. The NZLR is currently published for the Council by LexisNexis New Zealand Ltd. [3] The reports started in 1881 but complete sets have been deemed to start at 1861 and include a number of prior series.
Saunders & Co v Bank of New Zealand; Saunderson v Purchase; Schmidt v Holland; Seales v Attorney-General; Shivas v Bank of New Zealand; Shotter v Westpac Banking Corp; Slater Wilmhurst Ltd v Crown Group Custodian Ltd; Soccer Nelson Inc v Soccer NZ Inc; Stringer v Peat Marwick Mitchell & Co
Taylor v New Zealand Poultry Board; Teitiota v Chief Executive Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment; Television New Zealand Ltd v Quinn; Templeton v Jones; Terranova Homes & Care Limited v Service and Food Workers Union Nga Ringa Tota Incorporated; Tertiary Institutes Allied Staff Assoc Inc v Tahana
The judiciary of New Zealand is responsible for the system of courts that interprets and applies the laws of New Zealand.It has four primary functions: to provide a mechanism for dispute resolution; to deliver authoritative rulings on the meaning and application of legislation; to develop case law; and to uphold the rule of law, personal liberty and human rights. [1]