Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
[[Category:Family tree templates]] to the <includeonly> section at the bottom of that page. Otherwise, add <noinclude>[[Category:Family tree templates]]</noinclude> to the end of the template code, making sure it starts on the same line as the code's last character.
The most common way is to display a family tree on Wikipedia is as an ahnentafel by Template: Ahnentafel. However, there are other options. This page originated in examples taken from a discussion on the Village pump in March/April 2005 (see Talk page). It has since been updated to use later created templates.
Family tree showing the relationship of each person to the orange person, including cousins and gene share. A family tree, also called a genealogy or a pedigree chart, is a chart representing family relationships in a conventional tree structure. More detailed family trees, used in medicine and social work, are known as genograms.
Wikipedia:Family trees {}—This template produces one row in a "family tree"-like chart consisting of boxes and connecting lines {}—This template takes genealogical data in the form of an ahnentafel and presents it as a graphical ancestry tree
<noinclude>[[Category:British family tree templates]]</noinclude> to the end of the template code, making sure it starts on the same line as the code's last character. See also: Family tree of British monarchs
For example see: Dukes of Clarence family tree after fixing narrow boxes. However I don't think this is as elegant as Dukes of Clarence family tree before migration and is labour intensive. Template:Stammbaum which is a redirect to Template:Family tree. This redirect was set up to aid the import of family tree (like diagrams) from de.wiki.
This template is meant to be used in conjunction with {} and {{Tree chart/end}} to create various types of charts (such as family trees). See {{ Tree chart }} 's documentation for help on how to actually make charts.
English Wikipedia's image guidelines for living people stipulate that we can only use freely-licensed images of living people in articles, and our image use policy says that we can only use copyrighted images if no free alternative exists. This often means that editors themselves must take photographs of notable subjects, or that historical ...