enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Source criticism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_criticism

    A given source may be forged or corrupted; strong indications of the originality of the source increases its reliability. The closer a source is to the event which it purports to describe, the more one can trust it to give an accurate description of what really happened; A primary source is more reliable than a secondary source, which in turn ...

  3. American Psychological Association - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Psychological...

    Among these books are: the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (and a concise version titled Concise Rules of APA Style), which is the official guide to APA style; [18] [19] the APA Dictionary of Psychology; [20] an eight-volume Encyclopedia of Psychology; [21] and many scholarly books on specific subjects such as ...

  4. PsycINFO - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PsycINFO

    Chapters from authored and edited books make up 11% of database, while entire authored and edited books make up 4% of the database. Books are selected if they are scholarly, professional, or research-based, English-language, published worldwide, and relevant to psychology.

  5. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    Source reliability falls on a spectrum: No source is 'always reliable' or 'always unreliable' for everything. However, some sources provide stronger or weaker support for a given statement. Editors must use their judgment to draw the line between usable and inappropriate sources for each statement.

  6. For instance, otherwise unreliable self-published sources are usually acceptable to support uncontroversial information about the source's author. You should always try to use the best possible source, particularly when writing about living people. These are general guidelines, but the topic of reliable sources is a complicated one, and is ...

  7. Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (science) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...

  8. Wikipedia:What is a reliable source? - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_is_a...

    A reliable source is one that presents a well-reasoned theory or argument supported by strong evidence. Reliable sources include scholarly, peer-reviewed articles or books written by researchers for students and researchers, which can be found in academic databases and search engines like JSTOR and Google Scholar .

  9. Wikipedia:Evaluating sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Evaluating_sources

    Sources of information are commonly categorized as primary, secondary, or tertiary sources.In brief, a primary source is one close to the event with firsthand knowledge (for example, an eyewitness); a secondary source is at least one step removed (for example, a book about an event written by someone not involved in it); and a tertiary source is an encyclopaedia or textbook that provides a ...