enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Not gonna donate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Not_gonna_donate

    A Wikipedia that was influenced by financial donations would have access to far more money than whatever you are claiming you would have donated. Imagine a Wikipedia where the willingness to donate was allowed to control content and discussions.

  3. Wikipedia:Deletion policy/names and surnames - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../names_and_surnames

    Names should not be on Wikipedia, not because of any notability concerns but because they are dict. defs. I have no problems with pages such as List of Hebrew names and List of Arabic names and think non disambig articles on names should be redirected to these list pages. If more space is needed for origins and meaning a link should be provided ...

  4. Wikipedia : Your alma mater is not your ticket to Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Your_alma_mater...

    Adding the name of a non-notable individual to a stand-alone list of alumni is bad for several reasons. It undermines Wikipedia's legitimacy as an encyclopedia. Facebook, LinkedIn and other social networking sites provide people a forum to discuss their lives. Wikipedia is meant to provide factual information about notable topics.

  5. Wikipedia : Historical archive/Policy/Notability/Non-notability

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Historical...

    Articles about garage bands whose lead singer matches the name of the user who created the article are a common occurrence on Wikipedia, and are frequent cases of non-notable content. These and similar instances can be moved to the user's space by any editor, and the remaining redirect can be tagged for speedy deletion as a cross-namespace ...

  6. Wikipedia : Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arguments_to...

    This page details arguments that are commonly seen in deletion discussions that have been identified as generally unsound and unconvincing. These are arguments that should generally be avoided – or at the least supplemented with a better-grounded rationale for the position taken, whether that be "keep", "delete" or some other objective.

  7. Help:Download as PDF - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Download_as_PDF

    Some web browsers allow you to simply Save As... or Print to PDF. Wikipedia's inbuilt Download as PDF option. Other PDF software can be used to create a PDF from the web page, which may give more control over the output. This page offers help with Wikipedia's download tool.

  8. Wikipedia:Perennial proposals - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Perennial_proposals

    Reasons for previous rejection: All Wikipedia web pages contain a link to the Wikipedia:General disclaimer page, where you can access the content, legal, medical, risk and survey disclaimers. [1] In addition, Wikipedia is not censored for the protection of minors. Our mission is to document human knowledge, no matter how unpleasant or offensive ...

  9. Wikipedia : Before commenting in a deletion discussion

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Before...

    See Wikipedia:Follow the leader for more details. Get to know what policies, guidelines, and essays can be best used to prove your point. There are plenty of them out there. Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines to cite in deletion debates gives an easy-to-read list of those that can help you find what best fits.