Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Statistics, when used in a misleading fashion, can trick the casual observer into believing something other than what the data shows. That is, a misuse of statistics occurs when a statistical argument asserts a falsehood. In some cases, the misuse may be accidental. In others, it is purposeful and for the gain of the perpetrator.
Furthermore, another study shows that women are more probable to volunteer for studies than men. [9] Funding bias may lead to the selection of outcomes, test samples, or test procedures that favor a study's financial sponsor. [10] Attrition bias arises due to a loss of participants, e.g., loss of follow up during a study. [11]
Across the 200 meta-analyses, the median of studies with adequate statistical power was between 7.7% and 9.1%, implying that a positive result would replicate with probability less than 10%, regardless of whether the positive result was a true positive or a false positive. [15] The statistical power of neuroscience studies is
For example, a 2013 study found that 91% of artists were undiscovered on social media, and just 1.1% were mainstream or mega-sized. [18] The overwhelming majority of failures are not visible to the public eye, and only those who survive the selective pressures of their competitive environment are seen regularly.
Excluding subjects who move out of the study area during follow-up is rather equivalent of dropout or nonresponse, a selection bias in that it rather affects the internal validity of the study. Healthy user bias, when the study population is likely healthier than the general population. For example, someone in poor health is unlikely to have a ...
Academic studies often make use of statistical techniques that are hard for the average person to decipher, ... Haidt does have some solid policy proposals that don't suffer from this flaw. When ...
An investigation by the UK scientific journal Nature published on 8 January 2020, found that eight James Cook University (JCU) studies on the effect of climate change on coral reef fish, one of which was authored by the JCU educated discredited scientist Oona Lönnstedt, had a 100 percent replication failure and thus none of the findings of the ...
It is quite possible to make errors in the statistics used to do the analysis, and in 2002 Richard Parker, a law professor at the University of Connecticut, argued that all the widely published studies suffered from unacceptable flaws.