enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States v. Davis (2019) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Davis_(2019)

    18 U.S.C. § 924(c) contains both an “elements clause” and a “residual clause.” [8] The elements clause defines an offense as a crime of violence if it “has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another,” and the residual clause defines an offense as a crime of violence if it, “by its nature, involves a ...

  3. United States v. Davis (2014) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Davis_(2014)

    Quartavious Davis is a United States federal legal case that challenged the use in a criminal trial of location data obtained without a search warrant from MetroPCS, a cell phone service provider. Mobile phone tracking data had helped place the defendant in this case at the scene of several crimes, for which he was convicted.

  4. Davis v. United States (2011) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._United_States_(2011)

    Davis v. United States , 564 U.S. 229 (2011), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States "[held] that searches conducted in objectively reasonable reliance on binding appellate precedent are not subject to the exclusionary rule ". [ 1 ]

  5. United States v. Davis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Davis

    United States v. Davis may refer to: United States v. Davis, a U.S. Supreme Court opinion on tax treatment of divorce settlements; United States v. Davis, an 11th Circuit ruling on the need for a warrant to obtain cell phone location data; United States v. Davis, a U.S. Supreme Court opinion on the residual clause of the Hobbs Act

  6. Kim Davis hopes her case overturns Supreme Court’s gay ...

    www.aol.com/kim-davis-hopes-her-case-172357446.html

    Here’s what you need to know about Davis and her court case: ... The high court, ruling in cases combined out of Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee, said the U.S. Constitution gives same-sex ...

  7. Davis v. United States (1973) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._United_States_(1973)

    Davis v. United States, 411 U.S. 233 (1973), was a 1973 United States Supreme Court case concerning criminal procedure and collateral attacks on criminal convictions. The majority opinion, authored by then-Associate Justice William Rehnquist, held that when claims of unconstitutional jury discrimination are brought on postconviction collateral review, they are subject to the timeliness ...

  8. AOL Mail is free and helps keep you safe.

    mail.aol.com/d?reason=invalid_cred

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. AOL latest headlines, entertainment, sports, articles for business, health and world news.