Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
If r < 1, then the series converges. If r > 1, then the series diverges. If r = 1, the root test is inconclusive, and the series may converge or diverge. The ratio test and the root test are both based on comparison with a geometric series, and as such they work in similar situations.
If r < 1, then the series converges absolutely. If r > 1, then the series diverges. If r = 1, the root test is inconclusive, and the series may converge or diverge. The root test is stronger than the ratio test: whenever the ratio test determines the convergence or divergence of an infinite series, the root test does too, but not conversely. [1]
If X n converges in probability to X, and if P(| X n | ≤ b) = 1 for all n and some b, then X n converges in rth mean to X for all r ≥ 1. In other words, if X n converges in probability to X and all random variables X n are almost surely bounded above and below, then X n converges to X also in any rth mean. [10] Almost sure representation ...
In this example, the ratio of adjacent terms in the blue sequence converges to L=1/2. We choose r = (L+1)/2 = 3/4. Then the blue sequence is dominated by the red sequence r k for all n ≥ 2. The red sequence converges, so the blue sequence does as well. Below is a proof of the validity of the generalized ratio test.
A sequence is convergent if and only if every subsequence is convergent. If every subsequence of a sequence has its own subsequence which converges to the same point, then the original sequence converges to that point. These properties are extensively used to prove limits, without the need to directly use the cumbersome formal definition.
In mathematics, the comparison test, sometimes called the direct comparison test to distinguish it from similar related tests (especially the limit comparison test), provides a way of deducing whether an infinite series or an improper integral converges or diverges by comparing the series or integral to one whose convergence properties are known.
for every ε > 0, and whether the corresponding series of the f(n) still diverges. Once such a sequence is found, a similar question can be asked with f(n) taking the role of 1/n, and so on. In this way it is possible to investigate the borderline between divergence and convergence of infinite series.
In its simplest form, it says that a non-decreasing bounded-above sequence of real numbers ... converges to its smallest upper bound, its supremum. Likewise, a non-increasing bounded-below sequence converges to its largest lower bound, its infimum. In particular, infinite sums of non-negative numbers converge to the supremum of the partial sums ...