Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
"No net loss" is defined by the International Finance Corporation as "the point at which the project-related impacts on biodiversity are balanced by measures taken to avoid and minimize the project's impacts, to understand on site restoration and finally to offset significant residual impacts, if any, on an appropriate geographic scale (e.g local, landscape-level, national, regional)."
No Net Loss is a mitigation policy goal aiming to prevent and offset the destruction or degradation of wetlands. Under this bi-partisan policy, wetlands currently in existence are to be conserved if possible. No Net Loss is achieved through a coordinated effort of: [7] wetlands protection; creation of new wetlands; restoration, enhancement, and ...
No net loss refers to biodiversity policy that aims to neutralise the loss of biodiversity, relative to an appropriately determined reference scenario. [22] Net positive impact refers to a goal for project outcomes, where the project's impact on biodiversity is outweighed by actions to reduce, rehabilitate, and offset these impacts. [23]
Developers can purchase credits from mitigation banks to offset the "debit" of negative environmental impacts with the aim of achieving no net loss of wetlands. No net loss is the policy objective used to guide compensatory mitigation in the United States, but has since expanded to other countries, where no net loss of biodiversity may be ...
The definition also states that the goal of biodiversity offsets is to achieve no net loss of biodiversity, or ideally, a net gain. [6] No net loss (NNL) is an environmental policy approach, defined as a goal for development projects/activities and policies where impacts on biodiversity are either counterbalanced or outweighed by measures to ...
Net capital losses exceeding $3,000 can be carried forward indefinitely until they’re fully used. Here’s an example. Imagine you have $5,000 in unrealized losses and $1,000 in unrealized gains.
A policy of "no net loss" of habitat value and function has been used as the objective for mitigation banking in the United States since the 1990s. [18] This means that where impacts are caused, they should be compensated for using environmental mitigation measures like mitigation banking so that there is no overall loss in the value or ...
The Federal Policy on Wetland Conservation: Federal policy on wetland conservation; no net loss wetlands; protection, restoration, and management of Canadian wetlands [14] Fisheries Act: Prevents the harmful alteration of wetlands that would disrupt or destruct fish habitats [15] Canada Wildlife Act