Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Giles was convicted, and his conviction was affirmed by the California Supreme Court. [2] The court reasoned that the report of domestic violence was admissible under the forfeiture rule codified in California Evidence Code § 1370 because Giles had presumably made the declarant unavailable by murdering her. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Many cases of dowry-related domestic violence, suicides, and murders have been reported. A 1997 report claimed that at least 5000 women die each year because of dowry deaths and at least a dozen die each day in 'kitchen fires' thought to be intentional. [15] About 30 percent of reported dowry deaths result in convictions in courts. [7]
[193] [194] Families and couples in poverty may be more likely to experience domestic violence, due to increased stress and conflicts about finances and other aspects. [195] Some speculate that poverty may hinder a man's ability to live up to his idea of successful manhood, thus he fears losing honor and respect.
The bride, Claire Kendall Taetz, shared a video of the incident on TikTok which has since accumulated over three million views. The video shows her and her husband-to-be standing at an altar as a ...
A California newlywed was reportedly killed by two men who crashed his wedding reception. Joe Melgoza, 30, died the day after his wedding from blunt head trauma, according to NBC News .
Forced marriages are often related to violence, both in regard to violence perpetrated inside the marriage (domestic violence), and in regard to violence inflicted in order to force an unwilling participant to accept the marriage, or to punish a refusal (in extreme cases women and girls who do not accept the marriage are subjected to honor ...
The soon-to-be bride and groom are still confused on whether or not they accidentally got married. "We honestly aren’t sure," Lushan admits. "In the ceremony room we told him this wasn't what we ...
Roldan v. Los Angeles County, 129 Cal. App. 267, 18 P.2d 706, was a 1933 court case in California confirming that the state's anti-miscegenation laws at the time did not bar the marriage of a Filipino and a white person. [1]