Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
To split an AVL tree into two smaller trees, those smaller than key k, and those greater than key k, first draw a path from the root by inserting k into the AVL. After this insertion, all values less than k will be found on the left of the path, and all values greater than k will be found on the right.
AA tree; AVL tree; Binary search tree; Binary tree; Cartesian tree; Conc-tree list; Left-child right-sibling binary tree; Order statistic tree; Pagoda; Randomized binary search tree; Red–black tree; Rope; Scapegoat tree; Self-balancing binary search tree; Splay tree; T-tree; Tango tree; Threaded binary tree; Top tree; Treap; WAVL tree; Weight ...
Join follows the right spine of t 1 until a node c which is balanced with t 2. At this point a new node with left child c, root k and right child t 2 is created to replace c. The new node may invalidate the balancing invariant. This can be fixed with rotations. The following is the join algorithms on different balancing schemes. The join ...
A rooted tree T that is a subgraph of some graph G is a normal tree if the ends of every T-path in G are comparable in this tree-order (Diestel 2005, p. 15). Rooted trees, often with an additional structure such as an ordering of the neighbors at each vertex, are a key data structure in computer science; see tree data structure.
A weight-balanced tree is a binary search tree that stores the sizes of subtrees in the nodes. That is, a node has fields key, of any ordered type; value (optional, only for mappings) left, right, pointer to node; size, of type integer. By definition, the size of a leaf (typically represented by a nil pointer) is zero.
The weak AVL tree is defined by the weak AVL rule: Weak AVL rule: all rank differences are 1 or 2, and all leaf nodes have rank 0. Note that weak AVL tree generalizes the AVL tree by allowing for 2,2 type node. A simple proof shows that a weak AVL tree can be colored in a way that represents a red-black tree.
Self-balancing binary trees solve this problem by performing transformations on the tree (such as tree rotations) at key insertion times, in order to keep the height proportional to log 2 (n). Although a certain overhead is involved, it is not bigger than the always necessary lookup cost and may be justified by ensuring fast execution of all ...
The successor can be either the largest key that is smaller than the one to be removed, or the smallest key that is larger than the one to be removed. It is simplest to make adjustments to the tree from the top down such that the leaf node found is not a 2-node. That way, after the swap, there will not be an empty leaf node.