enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Bostock v. Clayton County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bostock_v._Clayton_County

    Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020), is a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court civil rights decision in which the Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees against discrimination because of sexuality or gender identity. The plaintiff, Gerald Bostock, was fired from his county job after he ...

  3. Public employee pension plans in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_employee_pension...

    In many states, public employee pension plans are known as Public Employee Retirement Systems (PERS). Pension benefits may or may not be changed after an employee is hired, depending on the state and plan, as well as hiring date, years of service, and grandfathering. Retirement age in the public sector is usually lower than in the private ...

  4. Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilly_Ledbetter_Fair_Pay...

    The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111–2 (text) (PDF), S. 181) is a landmark federal statute in the United States that was the first bill signed into law by U.S. President Barack Obama on January 29, 2009. The act amends Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and states that the 180-day statute of limitations for filing an ...

  5. Janus v. AFSCME - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janus_v._AFSCME

    Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, No. 16-1466, 585 U.S. ___ (2018), abbreviated Janus v. AFSCME, is a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on US labor law, concerning the power of labor unions to collect fees from non-union members. Under the Taft–Hartley Act of 1947, which applies to the ...

  6. Timeline of women's legal rights in the United States (other ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_women's_legal...

    California Federal S. & L. Assn. v. Guerra is a Supreme Court case about whether a state may require employers to provide greater pregnancy benefits than required by federal law, as well as the ability to require pregnancy benefits to women without similar benefits to men. The court held that The California Fair Employment and Housing Act in ...

  7. Disparate impact - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_impact

    Disparate impact. Disparate impact in the law of the United States refers to practices in employment, housing, and other areas that adversely affect one group of people of a protected characteristic more than another, even though rules applied by employers or landlords are formally neutral. Although the protected classes vary by statute, most ...

  8. Employment discrimination law in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_discrimination...

    The United States Constitution also prohibits discrimination by federal and state governments against their public employees. Discrimination in the private sector is not directly constrained by the Constitution, but has become subject to a growing body of federal and state law, including the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Federal ...

  9. Federal Insurance Contributions Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Insurance...

    United States portal. v. t. e. The Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA / ˈfaɪkə /) is a United States federal payroll (or employment) tax payable by both employees and employers to fund Social Security and Medicare [1] —federal programs that provide benefits for retirees, people with disabilities, and children of deceased workers.