enow.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: functions of the bill lading law firm
  2. straight-bill-of-lading-short-form.pdffiller.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month

    A tool that fits easily into your workflow - CIOReview

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Uniform Bill of Lading Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Bill_of_Lading_Act

    The Uniform Bills of Lading Act was adopted in 1909 and passed by the U.S. Uniform Law Commission.The act addressed the judicial and legislative treatment of issues such as the extent of the carrier's liability to the consignee of the goods or to the buyer of the bill of lading based upon the carrier's issuance of the bill. [1]

  3. Bill of lading - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_of_lading

    An electronic bill of lading (or eB/L) is the legal and functional equivalent of a paper bill of lading. [27] An electronic bill of lading must replicate the core functions of a paper bill of lading, [28] namely its functions as a receipt, as evidence of or containing the contract of carriage and as a document of title. [citation needed]

  4. UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Transferable Records

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UNCITRAL_Model_Law_on...

    Initially, this was done to facilitate the use of electronic bills of lading as recommended in a report by the law firm Clyde & Co and the ICC Banking Commission. [27] MLETR adoption is now being actively promoted by the ICC Digital Standards Initiative (DSI), including as a manner to overcome the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and to ...

  5. Lickbarrow v Mason - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lickbarrow_v_Mason

    Lickbarrow v Mason ((1788), 2 T. R. 63 and (1794) 5 TR 683) refers to an English legal case in which it was determined that a shipped or endorsed bill of lading is a document of title at common law, i.e. a document which can be owned and therefore the ownership of it could be sold or otherwise transferred to someone else.

  6. Grant v Norway - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grant_v_Norway

    Grant v Norway (1851) [1] is a case on the Law of Carriage of Goods by Sea; but since 1992 it has no longer been good law.. This was an action upon the case by the indorsees of a bill of lading, against the owners of a vessel, to recover the amount of advances made by the former upon the bills of lading, the goods never having in fact been shipped.

  7. Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carriage_of_Goods_By_Sea...

    The Bills of Lading Act 1855 (18 & 19 Vict. c. 111) was commendably brief and proved useful, but as time went by certain defects became apparent. [3]The English courts devised some ways round the problem: in Brandt v Liverpool (1924) [4] [5] the concept of implied contracts was developed, although the courts proved reluctant to use this concept. [6]

  8. Carriage of Goods by Sea Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carriage_of_Goods_by_Sea_Act

    It is the U.S. enactment of the International Convention Regarding Bills of Lading, commonly known as the "Hague Rules". It was found in Title 46 Appendix of the United States Code , starting at Section 1301, but has been moved to a note in 46 United States Code 30701.

  9. Manifest (transportation) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifest_(transportation)

    In some cases, a single document may serve both purposes. In general, a bill of lading serves as a legal instrument focusing on and documenting such issues as ownership, whereas a cargo manifest is often more concerned with physical aspects of the cargo, such as weight and size. When the cargo is being shipped by several different shipping ...

  1. Ads

    related to: functions of the bill lading law firm