enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. The Supreme Court says it is adopting a code of ethics, but ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-says-adopting...

    The Supreme Court on Monday adopted its first code of ethics, in the face of sustained criticism over undisclosed trips and gifts from wealthy benefactors to some justices, but the code lacks a ...

  3. DeSantis administration settles lawsuit, will disclose COVID ...

    www.aol.com/court-orders-desantis-administration...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  4. Florida settles lawsuit over COVID data, agrees to provide ...

    www.aol.com/news/florida-settles-lawsuit-over...

    Florida will have to provide COVID-19 data to the public again after a former Democratic state representative settled a lawsuit with Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis' administration over the decision ...

  5. Goldberg v. Kelly - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldberg_v._Kelly

    Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires an evidentiary hearing before a recipient of certain government welfare benefits can be deprived of such benefits.

  6. Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americans_for_Prosperity...

    Bonta, 141 S.Ct. 2373 (2021), is a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the disclosure of donors to non-profit organizations. The case challenged California's requirement that non-profit organizations disclose the identity of their donors to the state's Attorney General as a precondition of soliciting donations in the state.

  7. Justice Thomas formally discloses donor-paid trips as ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/justice-thomas-formally...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  8. Astrue v. Capato - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrue_v._Capato

    Astrue v. Capato, 566 U.S. 541 (2012), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that children conceived after a parent's death are not entitled to Social Security Survivors benefits if the laws in the state that the parent's will was signed in forbid it. [1]

  9. No, Supreme Court hasn’t ruled COVID-19 vaccines cause ...

    www.aol.com/no-supreme-court-hasn-t-213225030.html

    USA TODAY, Jan. 14, 2022, Supreme Court blocks COVID-19 vaccine-or-testing mandate for workplaces but lets medical rule stand The Associated Press, May 10, 2022, Judge won’t make Sen. Warren ...