Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Proving a negative or negative proof may refer to: Proving a negative, in the philosophic burden of proof; Evidence of absence in general, such as evidence that there is no milk in a certain bowl; Modus tollens, a logical proof; Proof of impossibility, mathematics; Russell's teapot, an analogy: inability to disprove does not prove
A negative claim is the opposite of an affirmative or positive claim. It asserts the non-existence or exclusion of something. [10] Logicians and philosophers of logic reject the notion that it is intrinsically impossible to prove negative claims.
A negative claim may or may not exist as a counterpoint to a previous claim. A proof of impossibility or an evidence of absence argument are typical methods to fulfill the burden of proof for a negative claim. [13] [16] Philosopher Steven Hales argues that typically one can logically be as confident with the negation of an affirmation.
One of the widely used types of impossibility proof is proof by contradiction.In this type of proof, it is shown that if a proposition, such as a solution to a particular class of equations, is assumed to hold, then via deduction two mutually contradictory things can be shown to hold, such as a number being both even and odd or both negative and positive.
In propositional logic, modus tollens (/ ˈ m oʊ d ə s ˈ t ɒ l ɛ n z /) (MT), also known as modus tollendo tollens (Latin for "method of removing by taking away") [2] and denying the consequent, [3] is a deductive argument form and a rule of inference.
Prevalent proof fallacy – Using consensus or majority vote as evidence of truthfulness, often without regard for expert opinion. Proof by assertion – a proposition is repeatedly restated regardless of contradiction; sometimes confused with argument from repetition (argumentum ad infinitum, argumentum ad nauseam).
Such a proof is again a refutation by contradiction. A typical example is the proof of the proposition "there is no smallest positive rational number": assume there is a smallest positive rational number q and derive a contradiction by observing that q / 2 is even smaller than q and still positive.
Section - Proving a Negative "There can be multiple claims within a debate, nevertheless, whoever makes a claim carries the burden of proof regardless of positive or negative content in the claim." This comment does not seem to require any citation as burden of proof is a legal maxim and its definition follows the statement provided.