enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ohio v. Clark - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_v._Clark

    The United States Supreme Court unanimously reversed the Supreme Court of Ohio on June 18, 2015. The Court held that the out-of-court statements were admissible because the primary purpose was not to create evidence. Citing a prior related case, Michigan v. Bryant, the Court formulated this test as one asking "whether a statement was given with ...

  3. Crawford v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crawford_v._Washington

    Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that reformulated the standard for determining when the admission of hearsay statements in criminal cases is permitted under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. The Court held that prior testimonial statements of witnesses who have since ...

  4. Hearsay in United States law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay_in_United_States_law

    The Supreme Court has further clarified that a "statement" refers to "a single declaration or remark, rather than a report or narrative". [3] Thus, a trial court must separately analyze each individual statement, "sentence-by-sentence", [4] rather than analyzing the narrative as whole for hearsay content or exceptions.

  5. Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Board_of...

    Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that: . certain public-sector employees can have a property interest in their employment, per Constitutional Due Process.

  6. What cases get to the U.S. Supreme Court? Any the Justices ...

    www.aol.com/cases-u-supreme-court-justices...

    The Supreme Court receives about 7,000 to 8,000 petitions filed each term, and will decide about 80 cases on average. Kevin Wagner is a noted constitutional scholar and political science professor ...

  7. Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio

    Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. [1] The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action".

  8. Here’s what federal judges could do if they’re ignored by the ...

    www.aol.com/federal-judges-could-ignored-trump...

    David Cole, a Georgetown Law professor who has repeatedly argued cases before the Supreme Court on behalf of the American Civil Liberties Union, predicted that the most likely penalty a president ...

  9. Of the 116 Supreme Court justices in US history, all but 8 ...

    www.aol.com/news/116-supreme-court-justices-us...

    Since the Supreme Court first convened in 1790, 116 justices have served on the bench. Of those, 108 have been White men. But in recent decades the court has become more diverse. Over half of its ...