Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Beswick v Beswick [1967] UKHL 2, [1968] AC 58 was a landmark English contract law case on privity of contract and specific performance.The House of Lords, overruling the decision of Lord Denning in the Court of Appeal, ruled that a person who was not party to a contract had no independent standing to sue to enforce it, even if the contract was clearly intended for their benefit.
Although damages are the usual remedy for the breach of a contract for the benefit of a third party, if damages are inadequate, specific performance may be granted (Beswick v. Beswick [1968] AC 59). The issue of third-party beneficiaries has appeared in cases where a stevedore has claimed it is covered under the exclusion clauses in a bill of ...
Beswick v Beswick [1966] Ch 538, Denning allows a poor widow to reclaim the assets of her late husband when it was taken from her husband's nephew (disapproved in [1968] AC 58). Morris v CW Martin & Sons Ltd [1966] 1 QB 716; Wheat v E Lacon & Co Ltd [1966] 1 All ER 582; defines "occupier" for the purposes of Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 ...
The current charges involve images taken of a 2-year-old, a 4-year-old and two women at a children’s swim school in Oakland County. Michigan doctor charged with taking photos and videos of naked ...
Photos and videos shared by Saldaña show the family together at the beach, at home, on planes and in bed, interspersed with solo selfies of the actor and date nights with her husband, 44.
Privity is a doctrine in English contract law that covers the relationship between parties to a contract and other parties or agents. At its most basic level, the rule is that a contract can neither give rights to, nor impose obligations on, anyone who is not a party to the original agreement, i.e. a "third party".
The pilot and co-pilot of the doomed medical transport flight that crashed into a northeast Philadelphia neighborhood, and a doctor on board, have been identified.
Suisse Atlantique Societe d'Armament SA v NV Rotterdamsche Kolen Centrale [1967] 1 A.C. 361; Boardman v Phipps [1967] 2 AC 46; Vandervell v IRC [1967] 2 AC 291; Beswick v Beswick [1968] AC 58; C Czarnikow Ltd v Koufos or The Heron II [1969] 1 AC 350; In re Gulbenkian's Settlements [1970] AC 508; Pettitt v. Pettitt [1970] A.C. 777