Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The semantic gap characterizes the difference between two descriptions of an object by different linguistic representations, for instance languages or symbols. According to Andreas M. Hein, the semantic gap can be defined as "the difference in meaning between constructs formed within different representation systems". [ 1 ]
Semantic intelligence [1] is the ability to gather the necessary information to allow to identify, detect and solve semantic gaps on all level of the organization.. Similar to Operational intelligence or Business Process intelligence, which aims to identify, detect and then optimize business processes, semantic intelligence targets information instead of processes.
The symbol grounding problem is a concept in the fields of artificial intelligence, cognitive science, philosophy of mind, and semantics.It addresses the challenge of connecting symbols, such as words or abstract representations, to the real-world objects or concepts they refer to.
A semantic field denotes a segment of reality symbolized by a set of related words. The words in a semantic field share a common semantic property. [6] A general and intuitive description is that words in a semantic field are not necessarily synonymous, but are all used to talk about the same general phenomenon. [7]
The theory first appeared in an article published by linguist Hans Josef Vermeer in the German Journal Lebende Sprachen, 1978. [2]As a realisation of James Holmes’ map of Translation Studies (1972), [3] [4] skopos theory is the core of the four approaches of German functionalist translation theory [5] that emerged around the late twentieth century.
The Ingenuity Gap is a popular science book. [10] Homer-Dixon takes an inter-disciplinary approach connecting political science with sociology, economics, history, biology, and ecology. [11] [12] [13] The narrative is structured as a travelogue as the author travels to meet experts and construct his theory. [14]
The semantic link network was systematically studied as a semantic social networking method. Its basic model consists of semantic nodes, semantic links between nodes, and a semantic space that defines the semantics of nodes and links and reasoning rules on semantic links. The systematic theory and model was published in 2004. [20]
The fact–value distinction is a fundamental epistemological distinction described between: [1]. Statements of fact (positive or descriptive statements), which are based upon reason and observation, and examined via the empirical method.