Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Health Technology Assessment is a weekly peer-reviewed open access medical journal published by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), [1] [2] a research partner of the United Kingdom National Health Service. It publishes research on the evaluations of health technologies, their effectiveness, cost and broader impact. [3]
The National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) is the British government's major funder of clinical, public health, social care and translational research. [3] With a budget of over £1.2 billion in 2020–21, [4] its mission is to "improve the health and wealth of the nation through research". [5]
The document includes a succinct set of practical guidelines explaining how to write complete, concise and clear manuscripts. [5] It is supplemented with a list for further reading as well as several short appendices (Abstracts; Ambiguity; Cohesion; Ethics; Plurals; Simplicity; Spelling; Text-tables) that present selected issues in greater detail or provide more examples.
Title Primary article Related articles Articles to be created "Experience of children and young people cared for in mental health, learning disability and autism inpatient settings". 2021-06-09.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more
More than half of the OA publications (27.5% of all indexed works in 2023) were in fully Gold Open Access sources, 16.7% of all were in Green OA sources (i.e. which allow for self-archiving by authors), 9.2 % in Hybrid Gold OA sources (such as journals, which have open access and behind-paywall articles in the same issue), and 10.6 % were in ...
Version License American Association for the Advancement of Science: Not-for-profit servers (e.g. arXiv, bioRxiv, chemRxiv, medRxiv) Unrestricted Unrestricted [2] American Association for Cancer Research: Unrestricted Must not post revised manuscript (after peer review or editorial comment) Unrestricted [3] American Association for Physics in ...
A 2004 editorial in the Canadian Medical Association Journal noted that Cochrane reviews appear to be more up to date and of better quality than other reviews, describing them as "the best single resource for methodologic research and for developing the science of meta-epidemiology" and crediting them with leading to methodological improvements in the medical literature.