enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Version history for TLS/SSL support in web browsers

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Version_history_for_TLS/...

    Internet Explorer 11 [n 20] Windows Schannel: 11 12–13 Windows 10 1507–1511: Disabled by default Yes [63] Yes Yes Yes [n 24] No Yes Yes Yes Mitigated Not affected Mitigated Disabled by default [n 16] Mitigated Mitigated Yes [n 10] 11 14–18 (client only) Windows 10 1607–2004 Windows Server (SAC) 1709–2004 No [74] Disabled by default ...

  3. Comparison of TLS implementations - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_TLS...

    A workaround for SSL 3.0 and TLS 1.0, roughly equivalent to random IVs from TLS 1.1, was widely adopted by many implementations in late 2011. [30] In 2014, the POODLE vulnerability of SSL 3.0 was discovered, which takes advantage of the known vulnerabilities in CBC, and an insecure fallback negotiation used in browsers.

  4. wolfSSL - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WolfSSL

    The wolfSSL lightweight SSL library implements the following protocols: [11] SSL 3.0, TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2, TLS 1.3; DTLS 1.0, DTLS 1.2, DTLS 1.3; Extensions: Server Name Indication (SNI), Maximum Fragment Length, Truncated HMAC, Application Layer Protocol Negotiation (ALPN), Extended Master Secret

  5. GnuTLS - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GnuTLS

    GnuTLS (/ ˈ ɡ n uː ˌ t iː ˌ ɛ l ˈ ɛ s /, the GNU Transport Layer Security Library) is a free software implementation of the TLS, SSL and DTLS protocols. It offers an application programming interface (API) for applications to enable secure communication over the network transport layer, as well as interfaces to access X.509, PKCS #12, OpenPGP and other structures.

  6. Transport Layer Security - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security

    wolfSSL enabled the use of TLS 1.3 as of version 3.11.1, released in May 2017. [59] As the first commercial TLS 1.3 implementation, wolfSSL 3.11.1 supported Draft 18 and now supports Draft 28, [60] the final version, as well as many older versions. A series of blogs were published on the performance difference between TLS 1.2 and 1.3.

  7. Opportunistic TLS - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opportunistic_TLS

    The TLS standard, however, does not specify how protocols add security with TLS; the decisions on how to initiate TLS handshaking and how to interpret the authentication certificates exchanged are left to the judgment of the designers and implementors of protocols that run on top of TLS. [2]

  8. HTTP/2 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP/2

    HTTP/2 is defined both for HTTP URIs (i.e. without TLS encryption, a configuration which is abbreviated in h2c) and for HTTPS URIs (over TLS using ALPN extension [45] where TLS 1.2 or newer is required, a configuration which is abbreviated in h2).

  9. Server Name Indication - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication

    Encrypted Client Hello (ECH) is a TLS 1.3 protocol extension that enables encryption of the whole Client Hello message, which is sent during the early stage of TLS 1.3 negotiation. [10] ECH encrypts the payload with a public key that the relying party (a web browser) needs to know in advance, which means ECH is most effective with large CDNs ...