enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of free and open-source software licenses

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_free_and...

    This table lists for each license what organizations from the FOSS community have approved it – be it as a "free software" or as an "open source" license – , how those organizations categorize it, and the license compatibility between them for a combined or mixed derivative work. Organizations usually approve specific versions of software ...

  3. California Court Case Management System - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Court_Case...

    Five Superior Courts—in Orange, Sacramento, San Diego, San Joaquin, and Ventura Counties—use CCMS version 3 to process civil cases. This represents approximately 25 percent of the civil case volume in California. [3] Fresno is the only Superior Court still using version 2 of CCMS.

  4. Open source license litigation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source_license_litigation

    Following Jacobsen v Katzer, Artifex Software Inc v Hancom Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California centered on breaches of open source software licenses, including breaches of contract as well as infringements of copyright. Artifex is the exclusive licensor of the software product, Ghostscript, under the ...

  5. Software license - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_license

    Diagram of software under various licenses according to the FSF and their The Free Software Definition: on the left side "free software", on the right side "proprietary software". On both sides, and therefore mostly orthogonal, "free download" . A software license is a legal instrument governing the use or redistribution of software.

  6. Free-software license - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-software_license

    SLUC is a software license published in Spain in December 2006 to allow all but military use. The writers of the license maintain it is free software, but the Free Software Foundation says it is not free because it infringes the so-called "zero freedom" of the GPL, that is, the freedom to use the software for any purpose. [77]

  7. Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Associates...

    The court agreed with district court's refusal to follow the Whelan logic because the test is "conceptually overbroad." [ 1 ] A program can have multiple functions and thus many ideas. As an alternate metric, the court presented a three-step test to determine substantial similarity, abstraction-filtration-comparison .

  8. Free Law Project - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Law_Project

    Free Law Project has a number of initiatives, including: CourtListener.com, [7] which provides a searchable and API-accessible website with court dockets, 900,000 minutes of oral argument recordings, more than eight thousand judges, and more than three million opinions. All of the opinions on Court Listener are interlinked by a citator, and the ...

  9. Software Freedom Law Center - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_Freedom_Law_Center

    The Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC) is an organization that provides pro bono legal representation and related services to not-for-profit developers of free software/open source software. It was launched in February 2005 with Eben Moglen as chairman. Initial funding of US$4 million was pledged by Open Source Development Labs.