Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
[1] [2] The lawsuit contrasts the practices of Apple with those of Microsoft in United States v. Microsoft Corp., and alleges that Apple is engaging in similar tactics and committing even more egregious violations. [3] This lawsuit comes in the wake of Epic Games v. Apple and the enforcement of the Digital Markets Act in the European Union. [4]
First Disney, then Meta. Now it looks like Paramount is planning to settle a Trump lawsuit. In normal times, Trump's suits against media and tech companies that upset him would face a steep challenge.
The case In re Apple iPod iTunes Antitrust Litigation was filed as a class action in 2005 [9] claiming Apple violated the U.S. antitrust statutes in operating a music-downloading monopoly that it created by changing its software design to the proprietary FairPlay encoding in 2004, resulting in other vendors' music files being incompatible with and thus inoperable on the iPod. [10]
The US Justice Department filed an antitrust lawsuit against Apple ... Apple generates the bulk of its cash through the sale of its wildly popular iPhone, which accounted for $200.6 billion of the ...
“For Apple’s employees, the Apple ecosystem is not a walled garden. It is a prison yard,” the lawsuit reads. A current Apple employee is suing the company, alleging it spies on employees ...
TNA Entertainment, LLC v. Wittenstein and World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. use of secret contact information to steal talent: Turkmen v. Ashcroft: unlawful detainment: Vroegh v. Eastman Kodak Company: false advertising, unfair business practices, breach of contract, fraud, deceit and/or misrepresentation: World Jewish Congress lawsuit ...
A federal judge previously tossed a lawsuit against Meta over these ambiguities, ruling that regulators didn't sufficiently define the social-media market the FTC had alleged Meta monopolized ...
Craigslist Inc. v. 3Taps Inc., 942 F.Supp.2d 962 (N.D. Cal. 2013) was a Northern District of California Court case in which the court held that sending a cease-and-desist letter and enacting an IP address block is sufficient notice of online trespassing, which a plaintiff can use to claim a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.