Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Supreme Court of the United States handed down sixteen per curiam opinions during its 2017 term, which began October 2, 2017, and concluded September 30, 2018. [1] ...
2017 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States#Kisela v. Hughes; Retrieved from " ...
This template is used on approximately 4,300 pages and changes may be widely noticed. Test changes in the template's /sandbox or /testcases subpages, or in your own user subpage . Consider discussing changes on the talk page before implementing them.
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 584 of the United States Reports: . Note: As of August 2024, final bound volumes for the U.S. Supreme Court's United States Reports have been published through volume 579.
Template parameters [Edit template data] This template prefers block formatting of parameters. Parameter Description Type Status; Case name: name: The short name of the case, which should preferably be the same as the article title. If the parameter is omitted, the article name is used. String: suggested: Litigants: Litigants: no description ...
Hughes, 258 U.S. 126 (1922), and Leser v. Garnett , 258 U.S. 130 (1922) , are a pair of cases regarding the Nineteenth Amendment . The Court ruled that Fairchild, as a private citizen, lacked standing to challenge the amendment's ratification under the limitations of the Case or Controversy Clause of Article III . [ 2 ]
Places an in-line note in an article that marks information as [dated] and in need of an update after a given time Template parameters [Edit template data] Parameter Description Type Status Year 1 year The year the template should activate, if not specified the template will activate immediately. Enter a four-digit year. Number optional Month 2 month The month the template should activate, if ...
Hughes v. Northwestern University , 595 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Seventh Circuit erred in relying on the participants' ultimate choice over their investments to excuse allegedly imprudent decisions by respondents.