enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Disparate treatment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_treatment

    [3] [4] If an employer met its burden by showing that its practice was job-related, the plaintiff was required to show a legitimate alternative that would have resulted in less discrimination. [5] Twenty years after Griggs, the Civil Rights Act of 1991 was enacted. The Act included a provision codifying the prohibition on disparate-impact ...

  3. Disparate impact - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_impact

    [2] Where a disparate impact is shown, the plaintiff can prevail without the necessity of showing intentional discrimination unless the defendant employer demonstrates that the practice or policy in question has a demonstrable relationship to the requirements of the job in question. [3] This is the "business necessity" defense. [1]

  4. Employment discrimination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_discrimination

    One approach that mitigates discrimination by emphasizing skills is workforce development programs. Federally funded job training caters to the unemployed and minority groups by focusing on providing opportunities for them including those who have been discriminated against.

  5. Approaches to prejudice reduction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Approaches_to_Prejudice...

    Intergroup approaches to prejudice reduction have been studied a great deal in laboratory settings, as well as outside of the laboratory, particularly in schools. [1] Many intergroup prejudice reduction approaches are grounded in one of 3 main theoretical perspectives: interdependence, [2] intergroup contact, [3] and social identity. [4]

  6. Ricci v. DeStefano - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricci_v._DeStefano

    Before an employer can engage in intentional discrimination for the asserted purpose of avoiding or remedying an unintentional, disparate impact, the employer must have a strong basis in evidence to believe that it will be subject to disparate-impact liability if it fails to take the race-conscious, discriminatory action.

  7. Social stigma - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_stigma

    Stigma, though powerful and enduring, is not inevitable, and can be challenged. There are two important aspects to challenging stigma: challenging the stigmatization on the part of stigmatizers and challenging the internalized stigma of the stigmatized. To challenge stigmatization, Campbell et al. 2005 [32] summarise three main approaches.

  8. Occupational segregation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupational_segregation

    Gender egalitarian cultural principles, or changes in traditional gender norms, are one possible solution to occupational segregation in that they reduce discrimination, affect women's self-evaluations, and support structural changes. Horizontal segregation, however, is more resistant to change from simply modern egalitarian pressures. [10]

  9. Anti-discrimination law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-discrimination_law

    The Racial Discrimination Act 1975 was the first major anti-discrimination legislation passed in Australia, aimed at prohibiting discrimination based on race, ethnicity, or national origin. [12] Jurisdictions within Australia moved shortly after to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, through acts including the Equal Opportunity Act ...

  1. Related searches one approach to challenging discrimination is quizlet practice questions

    discrimination in the workplaceexamples of discrimination in employment
    what is employment discrimination