Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In the programming language C++, unordered associative containers are a group of class templates in the C++ Standard Library that implement hash table variants. Being templates , they can be used to store arbitrary elements, such as integers or custom classes.
In C++, the Standard Template Library (STL) provides the set template class, which is typically implemented using a binary search tree (e.g. red–black tree); SGI's STL also provides the hash_set template class, which implements a set using a hash table. C++11 has support for the unordered_set template class, which is implemented using a hash ...
similar to a set, multiset, map, or multimap, respectively, but implemented using a hash table; keys are not ordered, but a hash function must exist for the key type. These types were left out of the C++ standard; similar containers were standardized in C++11, but with different names (unordered_set and unordered_map). Other types of containers ...
<unordered_map> Added in C++11 and TR1. Provides the container class template std::unordered_map and std::unordered_multimap, hash tables. <unordered_set> Added in C++11 and TR1. Provides the container class template std::unordered_set and std::unordered_multiset. <vector> Provides the container class template std::vector, a dynamic array.
This page was last edited on 6 December 2011, at 12:57 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.
In C++, associative containers are a group of class templates in the standard library of the C++ programming language that implement ordered associative arrays. [1] Being templates, they can be used to store arbitrary elements, such as integers or custom classes.
A set with precisely two elements is also called a 2-set or (rarely) a binary set. An unordered pair is a finite set; its cardinality (number of elements) is 2 or (if the two elements are not distinct) 1. In axiomatic set theory, the existence of unordered pairs is required by an axiom, the axiom of pairing.
The axiom of pairing is generally considered uncontroversial, and it or an equivalent appears in just about any axiomatization of set theory. Nevertheless, in the standard formulation of the Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory, the axiom of pairing follows from the axiom schema of replacement applied to any given set with two or more elements, and thus it is sometimes omitted.