enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. TikTok v. Garland - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TikTok,_Inc._v._Garland

    TikTok, Inc. v. Garland is a lawsuit brought by social media company TikTok against the United States government.Chinese internet technology company ByteDance Ltd. and its subsidiary TikTok, Inc. claim that the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (PAFACA) violates the Freedom of Speech Clause of the First Amendment, the Bill of Attainder Clause of Article ...

  3. Court order - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_order

    A court order is an official proclamation by a judge (or panel of judges) that defines the legal relationships between the parties to a hearing, a trial, an appeal or other court proceedings. [1] Such ruling requires or authorizes the carrying out of certain steps by one or more parties to a case.

  4. Category:2024 United States judicial elections - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:2024_United...

    Pages in category "2024 United States judicial elections" The following 13 pages are in this category, out of 13 total. This list may not reflect recent changes .

  5. The biggest Supreme Court decisions of 2024: From ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/biggest-supreme-court-decisions-2024...

    The Supreme Court on July 1, 2024, kept on hold efforts by Texas and Florida to limit how Facebook, TikTok, X, YouTube and other social media platforms regulate content in a ruling that strongly ...

  6. Jay-Z, Diddy accusations create mystery surrounding female ...

    www.aol.com/jay-z-diddy-accusations-create...

    December 12, 2024 at 4:00 AM. ... He also requested the court to deny the plaintiff's request to proceed anonymously. Jay-Z and Diddy allegedly both raped a minor following the 2000 MTV VMAs.

  7. Appeals court to trigger injunction against IL’s gun ban, or ...

    www.aol.com/appeals-court-trigger-injunction...

    On Nov. 14, the appeals court said the district judge’s ruling was deficient and asked for arguments why the appeal should not be remanded back for a clearer order.

  8. National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. Brand X Internet Services, 545 U.S. 967 (2005), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that decisions by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on how to regulate Internet service providers are eligible for Chevron deference, in which the judiciary defers to an administrative agency's expertise under its governing ...

  9. Turkey's Halkbank loses latest bid to avoid US prosecution in ...

    www.aol.com/news/turkeys-halkbank-loses-latest...

    The New York-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined to have the full court reconsider a three-judge panel's October rejection of Halkbank's argument that it deserved immunity from ...