enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Aguilar v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aguilar_v._Texas

    Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 (1964), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that "[a]lthough an affidavit supporting a search warrant may be based on hearsay information and need not reflect the direct personal observations of the affiant, the magistrate must be informed of some of the underlying circumstances relied on by the person providing the information and some ...

  3. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsus_in_uno,_falsus_in...

    Although Edward Law, 1st Baron Ellenborough (pictured) rejected a categorical application of the rule falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus for English courts in the year 1809, the doctrine survives in some American jurisdictions. [1] Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus is a Latin [2] maxim [3] meaning "false in one thing, false in everything". [4]

  4. Supreme Court of Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_Texas

    The Texas Supreme Court consists of a Chief Justice and eight justices. All nine positions are elected, with a term of office of six years and no term limit. The Texas Supreme Court was established in 1846 to replace the Supreme Court of the Republic of Texas. It meets in downtown Austin, Texas in an office building near the Texas State Capitol.

  5. Texas Supreme Court rules against lawmakers who stopped ...

    lite.aol.com/politics/story/0001/20241115/1f9e4d...

    This spurred a legal conundrum between the state's criminal and civil courts, which ultimately led to the Texas Supreme Court temporarily ruling in Roberson's favor. Roberson, who was sentenced to death in 2003 for killing his 2-year-old daughter, has gained bipartisan support from lawmakers and medical experts who say he was convicted on ...

  6. Judiciary of Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judiciary_of_Texas

    The Texas Supreme Court has constitutional responsibility for the efficient administration of the judicial system and possesses the authority to make rules of administration applicable to the courts [18] in addition to promulgation and amend rules governing procedure in trial and appellate courts, and rules of evidence. [19]

  7. Federal Rules of Evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Rules_of_Evidence

    On December 1, 2011, the restyled Federal Rules of Evidence became effective. [13] Since the early 2000s, an effort had been underway to restyle the Federal Rules of Evidence as well as other federal court rules (e.g. the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). According to a statement by the advisory committee that had drafted the restyled rules ...

  8. Texas gets win from full appeals court in dispute with DOJ ...

    www.aol.com/texas-gets-win-full-appeals...

    The full 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals handed Texas a major win Tuesday in its ongoing legal dispute with the Biden administration over the state’s construction of a floating barrier in the ...

  9. Strict rules of evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_rules_of_evidence

    Strict rules of evidence is a term sometimes used in and about Anglophone common law.The term is not always seen as belonging to technical legal terminology; legislation seldom if ever names a set of laws with the term "strict rules of evidence"; and the term's precise application varies from one legal context to another.