enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Citizens United v. FEC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC

    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

  3. List of landmark court decisions in India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    S.P. Gupta v. Union of India [37] Established the Collegium system of the Indian Judicial System. 1993 Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India [38] Struck down the 99th Amendment of the Constitution of India and the proposal of the National Judicial Appointments Commission. 1998 In re Special reference 1 [39]

  4. Campaign finance in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_finance_in_the...

    Campaign finance law in the United States changed drastically in the wake of two 2010 judicial opinions: the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. FEC and the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in SpeechNow.org v.

  5. 2024 Indian general election - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Indian_general_election

    On 15 February 2024, the Supreme Court of India ruled that the Electoral Bond system of campaign financing that was introduced by the Modi government in 2017 which allowed individuals and companies to donate money to political parties anonymously and without limits was unconstitutional, saying that the process allowed donors to assert ...

  6. US Supreme Court rejects challenge to Alaska campaign finance law

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-rejects...

    The case before the U.S. Supreme Court, pursued by the conservative legal group Liberty Justice Center, involved only a challenge to the campaign-finance requirements of the Alaska measure.

  7. Campaign finance reform amendment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_finance_reform...

    While Citizens United is the Supreme Court case most cited by advocates for a campaign finance reform amendment, the underlying precedent for extending constitutional rights to corporations under the doctrine of corporate personhood is rooted in more than a century of Supreme Court decisions dating back to the 19th century.

  8. Supreme Court hands win to Sen. Ted Cruz in campaign ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-hands-win-sen...

    The Supreme Court struck down a provision of campaign finance law involving large loans from candidates to their own campaigns on Monday in a victory for Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas.

  9. Publicly funded elections - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publicly_funded_elections

    In 2015, the Supreme Federal Court declared corporate donations to political parties and campaigns to be unconstitutional. Before the decision, electoral laws allowed companies to donate up to 2% of their previous year's gross revenue to candidates or party campaign funds, which totaled over 76% ($760m) of the donations on the 2014 election.