enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Circular reasoning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning

    Circular reasoning (Latin: circulus in probando, "circle in proving"; [1] also known as circular logic) is a logical fallacy in which the reasoner begins with what they are trying to end with. [2] Circular reasoning is not a formal logical fallacy, but a pragmatic defect in an argument whereby the premises are just as much in need of proof or ...

  3. Begging the question - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question

    Closely connected with begging the question is the fallacy of circular reasoning (circulus in probando), a fallacy in which the reasoner begins with the conclusion. [26] The individual components of a circular argument can be logically valid because if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true, and does not lack relevance. However ...

  4. List of fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

    Circular reasoning (circulus in demonstrando) – the reasoner begins with what they are trying to end up with (e.g.: all bachelors are unmarried males). Fallacy of many questions (complex question, fallacy of presuppositions, loaded question, plurium interrogationum ) – someone asks a question that presupposes something that has not been ...

  5. Political argument - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_argument

    Political arguments are also used by citizens in ordinary interactions to comment on and understand political events. More often than not, political arguments tend to be circular, repeating the same facts as premises under perhaps slightly different guises. Much political argument concerns issues of taxation and government spending. [citation ...

  6. Bulverism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulverism

    Bulverism is a type of ad hominem rhetorical fallacy that combines circular reasoning and the genetic fallacy with presumption or condescension. The Bulverist assumes a speaker's argument is invalid or false and then explains why the speaker came to make that mistake or to be so silly (even if the opponent's claim is actually right) by ...

  7. Proof by assertion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_assertion

    Modern politics contains many examples of proofs by assertion. This practice can be observed in the use of political slogans, and the distribution of "talking points", which are collections of short phrases that are issued to members of modern political parties for recitation, and in order to achieve maximum message repetition. The technique is ...

  8. Circular Reasoning, Waste Avoidance Are Now Investable ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/circular-reasoning-waste...

    Linear is out. Circular is in and there's a new way for investors to tap into theme thanks to the recent debut of the Direxion World Without Waste ETF (NYSE: WWOW).What HappenedWWOW debuted last ...

  9. Foundationalism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundationalism

    Classically, foundationalism had posited infallibility of basic beliefs and deductive reasoning between beliefs—a strong foundationalism. [2] Around 1975, weak foundationalism emerged. [ 2 ] Thus recent foundationalists have variously allowed fallible basic beliefs, and inductive reasoning between them, either by enumerative induction or by ...