Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that set forth the legal test used when U.S. federal courts must defer to a government agency's interpretation of a law or statute. [1] The decision articulated a doctrine known as "Chevron deference". [2]
The case was remanded for the circuit court to determine whether the Table S-3 rule was adequately supported by the administrative record. After the Nuclear Regulatory Commission revised the rule, the Natural Resources Defense Council filed for judicial review of the new regulation.
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 568 U.S. 78 (2013), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Natural Resources Defense Council and Santa Monica Baykeeper challenged the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (District) for violating the terms of its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit as shown in ...
Natural Resources Defense Council. Known as Chevron deference, the 40-year-old decision instructed lower courts to defer to federal agencies when laws passed by Congress were too ambiguous.
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL Pursuant to Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Certificate Rule 7.1, the Natural Resources Defense Council (“NRDC”) states that it is a charitable corporation, organized under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and under New York State law,
Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7 (2008), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court concerning whether federal law restricted the United States Navy's ability to use sonar during drills given the possibility of a harmful effect on marine mammals such as whales.
Train v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. Air: federal regulation of state emission limitations: Supreme Court of the United States: 1975 Transco plc v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council: Land: water pipe leaking and washing away land: 2003 Tulee v. Washington: Fisheries: rights of Native Americans: Supreme Court of the United States ...
Case history; Prior: Natural Resources Defence Council, Inc. v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 685 F.2d 459 (D.C. Cir. 1982); cert. granted, 459 U.S. 1034 (1982).: Holding; The NRC complied with NEPA, and its decision is not arbitrary or capricious within the meaning of § 10(e) of the Administrative Procedure Act.