Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
"Stop and identify" laws in different states that appear to be nearly identical may be different in effect because of interpretations by state courts. For example, California "stop and identify" law, Penal Code §647(e) had wording [37] [38] [39] similar to the Nevada law upheld in Hiibel, but a California appellate court, in People v.
In Florida, the state’s Stop and ID laws become active when one is stopped by law enforcement, whether for a traffic violation or because of suspicion of a crime. Drivers are required by law to ...
Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, 542 U.S. 177 (2004), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a statute requiring suspects to disclose their names during a valid Terry stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment if the statute first requires reasonable suspicion of criminal involvement, and does not violate the Fifth Amendment if there is no ...
English: States and Territories with Stop and Identify laws as of 1 February 2018. Missouri has a stop and ID statute that only applies to Kansas City. Missouri has a stop and ID statute that only applies to Kansas City.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
Indiana may not have been one of the very best teams in college football, but a team that goes 11-1 in a power conference was always going to be a foregone conclusion to make the 12-team College ...
Stop & Shop has 395 stores in Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Islandand parts of New York and New Jersey. That includes 26 locations in Rhode Island (27, if you count the one just over the ...
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the court ruled that it is constitutional for American police to "stop and frisk" a person they reasonably suspect to be armed and involved in a crime.