Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The most basic four-platoon schedule is a straight rotation of 24-hour work shifts between four work groups or platoons. This schedule works 48 hours per week for three weeks and 24 hours the fourth week, averaging 42 hours per week.
A schedule is strict if for any two transactions T1, T2, if a write operation of T1 precedes a conflicting operation of T2 (either read or write), then the commit or abort event of T1 also precedes that conflicting operation of T2. For example, the schedule F3 above is strict. Any strict schedule is cascade-less, but not the converse.
As an example, consider a hardware ISR that has a computation time, of 500 microseconds and a period, , of 4 milliseconds. If the shortest scheduler-controlled task has a period, T 1 {\displaystyle {T_{1}}} of 1 millisecond, then the ISR would have a higher priority, but a lower rate, which violates RMS.
The most common cause of no-show paradoxes is the use of instant-runoff (often called ranked-choice voting in the United States).In instant-runoff voting, a no-show paradox can occur even in elections with only three candidates, and occur in 50%-60% of all 3-candidate elections where the results of IRV disagree with those of plurality.
The mutual majority criterion is a generalized form of the criterion meant to account for when the majority prefers multiple candidates above all others; voting methods which pass majority but fail mutual majority can encourage all but one of the majority's preferred candidates to drop out in order to ensure one of the majority-preferred ...
The following example allocates 10 seats using the largest-remainder method by Droop quota. Party Votes ... and was designed to satisfy that criterion.
In communication networks, multiplexing and the division of scarce resources, max-min fairness is said to be achieved by an allocation if and only if the allocation is feasible and an attempt to increase the allocation of any participant necessarily results in the decrease in the allocation of some other participant with an equal or smaller allocation.
Example Condorcet method voting ballot. Blank votes are equivalent to ranking that candidate last. A Condorcet method (English: / k ɒ n d ɔːr ˈ s eɪ /; French: [kɔ̃dɔʁsɛ]) is an election method that elects the candidate who wins a majority of the vote in every head-to-head election against each of the other candidates, whenever there is such a candidate.