enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Column: IU President Whitten's 'no confidence' response was ...

    www.aol.com/column-iu-president-whittens-no...

    OPINION: IU grad worker with a teaching side gig writes he used Whitten's response to faculty no confidence vote to teach a difficult subject.

  3. Wikipedia : Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arguments_to...

    Some of the infirm arguments covered are those that are irrelevant or at best side issues, do not address the merits of the reason to keep or delete, are based on anecdote rather than evidence, engage in classic logical fallacies and more—and almost all share the trait of not being based upon the issues listed at Wikipedia:Deletion policy.

  4. Fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy

    Whately divided fallacies into two groups: logical and material. According to Whately, logical fallacies are arguments where the conclusion does not follow from the premises. Material fallacies are not logical errors because the conclusion follows from the premises. He then divided the logical group into two groups: purely logical and semi-logical.

  5. List of fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

    Syllogistic fallacieslogical fallacies that occur in syllogisms. Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise (illicit negative) – a categorical syllogism has a positive conclusion, but at least one negative premise. [11] Fallacy of exclusive premises – a categorical syllogism that is invalid because both of its premises are negative ...

  6. Fake news - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fake_news

    Fake news is false or misleading information presented as news. [10] [16] The term as it developed in 2017 is a neologism (a new or re-purposed expression that is entering the language, driven by culture or technology changes). [17]

  7. False balance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_balance

    Among Fox News guests in late 2013, this topic was presented in a contrarian way, with 31% of invited guests believing it was happening and 69% not. [1] False balance, known colloquially as bothsidesism, is a media bias in which journalists present an issue as being more balanced between opposing viewpoints than the evidence supports.

  8. Gun advocates don't make a logical argument | Opinion - AOL

    www.aol.com/gun-advocates-dont-logical-argument...

    Denying the antecedent is a logical fallacy based on drawing an untrue conclusion from an if–then argument. If X is true, then Y must also be true. More: RI Senate approves 'safe-storage' gun bill.

  9. False equivalence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence

    False equivalencies are developing on a grand scale as a result of relentlessly negative news. If everything and everyone is portrayed negatively, there's a leveling effect that opens the door to charlatans. The press historically has helped citizens recognize the difference between the earnest politician and the pretender.