enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Argumentation theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentation_theory

    Oral argument at the appellate level accompanies written briefs, which also advance the argument of each party in the legal dispute. A closing argument, or summation, is the concluding statement of each party's counsel reiterating the important arguments for the trier of fact, often the jury, in a court case. A closing argument occurs after the ...

  3. Argument - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument

    Arguments address problems of belief, explanations address problems of understanding. In the argument above, the statement, "Fred's cat has fleas" is up for debate (i.e. is a claim), but in the explanation, the statement, "Fred's cat has fleas" is assumed to be true (unquestioned at this time) and just needs explaining. [19]

  4. Goal structuring notation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goal_Structuring_Notation

    Goal structuring notation (GSN) is a graphical diagram notation used to show the elements of an argument and the relationships between those elements in a clearer format than plain text. [1] Often used in safety engineering, GSN was developed at the University of York during the 1990s to present safety cases. [2]

  5. Argumentation scheme - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentation_scheme

    Arguments containing implicit elements are called enthymemes, which is a term that was used by Aristotle in his works about dialectical reasoning and argument. [14]: 18 If an argument appears to match a scheme but is missing some elements, the scheme could be used as a guide to determining what is implicit in the argument.

  6. Pragma-dialectics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragma-dialectics

    Based on the meta-theoretical principles described above, the pragma-dialectical theory regards argumentation as ideally being part of a critical discussion. [4] The ideal model of a critical discussion treats argumentative discourse as a discussion in which argumentation is directed at the reasonable resolution of a difference of opinion.

  7. Logical reasoning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_reasoning

    Forms of logical reasoning can be distinguished based on how the premises support the conclusion. Deductive arguments offer the strongest possible support. Non-deductive arguments are weaker but are nonetheless correct forms of reasoning. [28] [29] The term "proof" is often used for deductive arguments or very strong non-deductive arguments. [30]

  8. Glossary of rhetorical terms - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_rhetorical_terms

    Straw man – an argument that is a logical fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position. Studia humanitatis – humanistic studies deemed indispensable in Renaissance-era education; rhetoric, poetics, ethics, politics. Syllogism – a type of valid argument that states if the first two claims are true, then the conclusion is ...

  9. Argument map - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_map

    An argument map or argument diagram is a visual representation of the structure of an argument. An argument map typically includes all the key components of the argument, traditionally called the conclusion and the premises , also called contention and reasons . [ 1 ]