Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
De Morgan's laws represented with Venn diagrams.In each case, the resultant set is the set of all points in any shade of blue. In propositional logic and Boolean algebra, De Morgan's laws, [1] [2] [3] also known as De Morgan's theorem, [4] are a pair of transformation rules that are both valid rules of inference.
De Morgan algebras are important for the study of the mathematical aspects of fuzzy logic. The standard fuzzy algebra F = ([0, 1], max( x , y ), min( x , y ), 0, 1, 1 − x ) is an example of a De Morgan algebra where the laws of excluded middle and noncontradiction do not hold.
The principle of inclusion–exclusion, combined with De Morgan's law, can be used to count the cardinality of the intersection of sets as well. Let A k ¯ {\displaystyle {\overline {A_{k}}}} represent the complement of A k with respect to some universal set A such that A k ⊆ A {\displaystyle A_{k}\subseteq A} for each k .
Destructive dilemma [1] [2] is the name of a valid rule of inference of propositional logic.It is the inference that, if P implies Q and R implies S and either Q is false or S is false, then either P or R must be false.
To investigate the left distributivity of set subtraction over unions or intersections, consider how the sets involved in (both of) De Morgan's laws are all related: () = = () always holds (the equalities on the left and right are De Morgan's laws) but equality is not guaranteed in general (that is, the containment might be strict).
In logic, a rule of replacement [1] [2] [3] is a transformation rule that may be applied to only a particular segment of an expression.A logical system may be constructed so that it uses either axioms, rules of inference, or both as transformation rules for logical expressions in the system.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
From a proof-theoretic perspective, Heyting’s calculus is a restriction of classical logic in which the law of excluded middle and double negation elimination have been removed. Excluded middle and double negation elimination can still be proved for some propositions on a case by case basis, however, but do not hold universally as they do ...