enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Terry v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_v._Ohio

    Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the court ruled that it is constitutional for American police to "stop and frisk" a person they reasonably suspect to be armed and involved in a crime.

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 392

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 392 of the ... Date decided Terry v. Ohio: 392 U.S. 1: 1968: Sibron v. New York: 392 U.S. 40: ...

  4. List of Terry stop case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Terry_stop_case_law

    Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961) — incorporated exclusionary rule against the states; Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) — stop and frisk for weapons OK for officer safety; Sibron v. New York, 392 U.S. 40 (1968) — companion case to Terry. Peters v. New York (1968) — companion case to Terry contained in Sibron

  5. Terry stop - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_stop

    The concept of a Terry stop originated in the 1968 Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio, in which a police officer detained three Cleveland men on the street behaving suspiciously, as if they were preparing for armed robbery.

  6. Stop-and-frisk in New York City - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop-and-frisk_in_New_York...

    In the cases of Terry v. Ohio, Sibron v. New York, and Peters v. New York, the Supreme Court granted limited approval in 1968 to frisks conducted by officers lacking probable cause for an arrest in order to search for weapons if the officer suspects the subject to be armed and presently dangerous. The Court's decision made suspicion of danger ...

  7. List of landmark court decisions in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) Police may stop a person if they have a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed or is about to commit a crime and frisk the suspect for weapons if they have a reasonable suspicion that the suspect is armed and dangerous without violating the Fourth Amendment. Mancusi v.

  8. Stop and identify statutes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_and_identify_statutes

    In the United States, interactions between police and others fall into three general categories: consensual ("contact" or "conversation"), detention (often called a Terry stop, after Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)), or arrest. "Stop and identify" laws pertain to detentions.

  9. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Warren Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    391 U.S. 510 (1968) constitutional status of a death-qualified jury: Pickering v. Board of Education: 391 U.S. 563 (1968) public employees' free speech rights Terry v. Ohio: Criminal procedure: 392 U.S. 1 (1968) search and seizure, power of police to stop and frisk suspicious persons Flast v. Cohen: 392 U.S. 83 (1968) taxpayer standing: United ...