Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. [1] was a case in which the United States District Court for the District of Columbia held several major tobacco companies liable for violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) Act [2] by engaging in numerous acts of fraud to further a conspiracy to deceive the American public about nicotine addiction and the health effects ...
The justices turned away an appeal by RJ Reynolds and other tobacco companies of a lower court's ruling that found that a set of health warnings required by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ...
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) attempted to regulate tobacco products. Tobacco companies, including Brown & Williamson and Philip Morris Companies (among others), challenged the regulations. [1] The District Court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's claim. The Circuit Court reversed, ruling for the tobacco company.
A case involving the vape industry gives the U.S. Supreme Court a chance to further erode the authority of federal regulatory agencies following other major rulings as the justices gird for a new ...
In a split opinion, the Court held that the Surgeon General's warning did not preclude lawsuits by smokers against tobacco companies on the basis of several claims. [ citation needed ] The case examined whether tobacco companies could be liable for not warning the consumer "adequately" of the dangers of cigarettes as well as ultimately held the ...
In the litigation against Big Tobacco, the plaintiffs argued that R.J. Reynolds Tobacco company’s adorable Joe Camel cartoon mascot was a ploy to attract children to cigarettes.
Intelius#Class action lawsuits; Japan Tobacco International#Canadian class action lawsuit; Joe Arpaio#Melendres v. Arpaio racial profiling class-action lawsuit; Judicial economy#Class action lawsuits; Kaplan, Inc.#Class-action lawsuit; Keele Valley Landfill#Resident class action lawsuit; Kemper Corporation#Class-action lawsuit
The lawsuit filed by the U.S. government alleges that the companies manufactured and sold “electronic nicotine delivery system products” without seeking FDA authorization.