enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Forum non conveniens - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forum_non_conveniens

    Forum non conveniens (Latin for "an inconvenient forum" [1] [2] [3]) (FNC) is a mostly common law legal doctrine through which a court acknowledges that another forum or court where the case might have been brought is a more appropriate venue for a legal case, and dismisses the case.

  3. Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gillespie_v._United_States...

    Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp., 379 U.S. 148 (1964), was a Supreme Court case that held that pre-trial appeals may be made on non-final issues if the trial judge, in his discretion, certifies a question of controlling law to the appellate court and the appellate court allows the appeal.

  4. List of United States courts of appeals cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F.2d. 772 (D.C. Cir. 1972): In medical malpractices cases, informed consent is required of the patient and no expert is required for the case to be heard by a jury. Acree v. Republic of Iraq, 370 F.3d 41 (D.C. Cir. 2004): Established the FSIA did not create new causes of action against foreign states.

  5. Farley v Skinner - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farley_v_Skinner

    Farley v Skinner [2001] UKHL 49 is an English contract law case, ... The Court of Appeal agreed with the ... if the cause of the inconvenience or discomfort is a ...

  6. Sturges v Bridgman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturges_v_Bridgman

    Sturges v Bridgman (1879) LR 11 Ch D 852 is a landmark case in nuisance decided by the Court of Appeal of England and Wales.It decides that what constitutes reasonable use of one's property depends on the character of the locality and that it is no defence that the plaintiff "came to the nuisance".

  7. 'Epic disaster': Donna Adelson's trial went off the rails ...

    www.aol.com/epic-disaster-donna-adelsons-trial...

    The continuance was more than a mere inconvenience. Several hundred jurors who had reported Tuesday were sent home. ... In his court filing, he cited a 3rd District Court of Appeal case from 1994 ...

  8. Jarvis v Swans Tours Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jarvis_v_Swans_Tours_Ltd

    The courts in those days only allowed the plaintiff to recover damages if he suffered physical inconvenience, such as having to walk five miles home, as in Hobbs' case; or to live in an over-crowded house, Bailey v. Bullock [1950] 2 All ER 1167. I think that those limitations are out of date.

  9. US asks court to reject TikTok's bid to stave off law that ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-asks-court-reject-delay...

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Justice Department late on Wednesday asked a U.S. appeals court to reject an emergency bid by TikTok to temporarily block a law that would require its Chinese parent ...