Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Brenner v. Manson, 383 U.S. 519 (1966), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held that a novel process for making a known steroid did not satisfy the utility requirement, because the patent applicants did not show that the steroid served any practical function. [1]
Assistant Secretary of Commerce and Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks (Public Law 97-366 of October 25, 1982) [4] Gerald J. Mossinghoff: 1981: 1985 Donald J. Quigg: 1985: 1990 Harry F. Manbeck, Jr. 1990: 1992 Bruce A. Lehman: August 5, 1993: 1998 Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the U.S. Patent and ...
The judge and Thaler agreed in this case that Thaler himself is unable to receive the patent on behalf of DABUS. [ citation needed ] In their August 5, 2022, Thaler decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed that only a natural person could be an inventor, which means that the AI that invents any other type of invention ...
Robert Jehan, of law firm Williams Powell, who represented Dr Thaler at the Supreme Court, said the judgment shows “how poorly current UK patent law supports the aim of making the UK a global ...
The Commissioner of Patents may refer to: Commissioner of Patents (Australia) Commissioner of Patents (Canada) Commissioner for Patents (US) who oversees the United States Patent and Trademark Office and reports to the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property. List of people who have headed the United States Patent Office
Artificial Inventor Project chief Ryan Abbott, who represented Thaler in the U.K. case, told me he found the ruling “unfortunate,” but he took heart from the fact that the Supreme Court said ...
The delay was attributed by spokesmen for the Patent Office to a combination of a sudden increase in business method patent filings after the 1998 State Street Bank decision, the unfamiliarity of patent examiners with the business and financial arts (e.g., banking, insurance, stock trading etc.), and the issuance of a number of controversial ...
Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Company v. Wagner Electric and Manufacturing Company. - Supreme Court, 1912. Bauer & Cie. v. O'Donnell - Supreme Court, 1913. Patent licensing terms do not include dictating the price of the product. The Fair v. Kohler Die and Specialty Company - Supreme Court, 1913. Dowagiac Manufacturing Company v.