Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Bushisms are unconventional statements, phrases, pronunciations, malapropisms, and semantic or linguistic errors made in the public speaking of George W. Bush, ...
George W. Bush during the 2004 campaign "Internets", also known as "The Internets", is a Bushism-turned catchphrase used humorously to portray the speaker as ignorant about the Internet or about technology in general, or alternatively as having a provincial or folksy attitude toward technology.
Nickname Personal name Notes Big Time Dick Cheney [5]: 46th Vice President of the United States of America: Vice Rummy Donald Rumsfeld [6]: 21st Secretary of Defense: Izzy Israel Hernandez [12]
Bush's detractors tended to focus on various linguistic errors made by him during his public speeches, colloquially known as Bushisms. [23] His mispronunciation of certain words was ridiculed in the media and in popular culture. Even as early as the 2000 presidential debates, it was the subject of a Saturday Night Live sketch (see Strategery). [24]
George W. Bushisms : the Slate book of the accidental wit and wisdom of our forty-third president. New York: Fireside. ISBN 978-0743222228. [1] Weisberg, Jacob (2002). More George W. Bushisms : more of Slate's accidental wit and wisdom of our forty-third president. New York: Fireside. ISBN 978-0743225199. [1] Weisberg, Jacob (2003).
A damaging quotation is a short utterance by a public figure used by opponents as a discrediting tactic.These quotations may be inserted or alluded to in negative political ads to discredit the character or intellectual ability of the originator.
Cunctator, moving "Bushisms" to "Bushism" was a bad idea, because "Bushisms" and "Goreisms" are sayings (some of them silly, embarrassing, or stupid), while Bushism is the emerging doctrine of the George W. Bush administration. Try searching Google for Bushism and then for Bushisms and you'll see what I mean.
Find reliable sources that define bushisms in detail. Individual quotes on the list of "Notable statements" should be cited the source that identified that particular statement as a Bushism. This is a crucial step. Linguistic analysis, if any, would be excellent.