enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Sauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sauvé_v_Canada_(Chief...

    The Court overturned the prior decision of the Federal Court of Appeal and held that section 51(e) of the old Canada Elections Act, which prohibited prisoners serving a sentence of over two years from voting, was unconstitutional. Section 51(e) had been repealed before the date of the Court's judgment, but the decision applied equally to ...

  3. Figueroa v Canada (AG) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Figueroa_v_Canada_(AG)

    Figueroa v Canada (AG), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 912 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the right to participate in a federal election under section 3 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court struck down a provision requiring a political party to nominate 50 candidates before receiving certain benefits.

  4. Section 3 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_3_of_the_Canadian...

    In 1988, section 3 had been used to grant suffrage to federal judges and those in mental institutions. A more controversial example is Sauvé v. Canada (2002), [2] in which it was found that prisoners could vote. They did so in the 2004 federal election, despite public opposition from Conservative leader Stephen Harper. [3] In the 2002 case ...

  5. Section 4 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_4_of_the_Canadian...

    Section 4 came before the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench in 1994, in the case Atkins et al. v. City of Calgary. [3] In Alberta, when municipal elections are held, work on proposed laws and agendas can be continued when the new municipal council meets. This is unusual, as at the federal and provincial level such legislation would expire and ...

  6. Maine's top election official appeals the ruling that delayed ...

    www.aol.com/news/maines-top-election-official...

    Maine's secretary of state is appealing a judge's ruling that put on hold her decision to remove former President Donald Trump from the ballot until the U.S. Supreme Court rules on a similar case ...

  7. Maine’s top court won’t review Trump ballot ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/maine-top-court-won-t-144236529.html

    Oral arguments are scheduled in that case for February 8. Maine is the second state to remove Trump’s name from the ballot, after Colorado’s Supreme Court declared Trump ineligible for the ...

  8. Harper v Canada (AG) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harper_v_Canada_(AG)

    Harper v Canada (AG), [2004] 1 S.C.R. 827, 2004 SCC 33, is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada wherein the Court ruled that Canada Elections Act's spending limits on third party election advertising did violate section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms but was justified under Section One of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

  9. Elections in Canada - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_Canada

    All Canadian citizens aged 18 or older who currently reside in Canada as of the polling day [2] (or at any point in their life have resided in Canada, regardless of time away) may vote in federal elections. [3] The most recent Canadian federal election occurred on September 20, 2021.