enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tinker_v._Des_Moines...

    Justice Abe Fortas wrote the majority opinion, holding that the speech regulation at issue in Tinker was "based upon an urgent wish to avoid the controversy which might result from the expression, even by the silent symbol of armbands, of opposition to this Nation's part in the conflagration in Vietnam." This decision made students and adults ...

  3. Substantial disruption - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substantial_Disruption

    The test, as set forth in the Tinker opinion, asks the question: Did the speech or expression of the student "materially and substantially interfere with the requirements of appropriate discipline in the operation of the school," or might it "reasonably have led school authorities to forecast substantial disruption of or material interference ...

  4. Symbolic speech - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbolic_speech

    The facts of Tinker's protest, suspension, and their lawyers' case are summarized in the Supreme Court's opinion, Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503, (1969) The facts of O'Brien's protest, arrest, and trial are summarized in the Supreme Court's opinion, United States v.

  5. Mary Beth Tinker - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Beth_Tinker

    Mary Beth Tinker is an American free speech activist known for her role in the 1969 Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District Supreme Court case, which ruled that Warren Harding Junior High School could not punish her for wearing a black armband in school in support of a truce in the Vietnam War .

  6. Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahanoy_Area_School...

    The majority opinion was written by Justice Breyer, and overruled some of the Third Circuit's majority opinion in relationship to Tinker in that it was too broad towards off-campus speech, and that schools may have a legitimate interest in restricting off-campus speech, such as in relation to harassment and bullying.

  7. Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hazelwood_School_District...

    Hazelwood School District et al. v. Kuhlmeier et al., 484 U.S. 260 (1988), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States which held, in a 5–3 decision, that student speech in a school-sponsored student newspaper at a public high school could be censored by school officials without a violation of First Amendment rights if the school's actions were "reasonably related" to a ...

  8. Bethel School District v. Fraser - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bethel_School_District_v...

    The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the freedom of speech.In Tinker v.Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), the Court held that speech made by students in public schools is protected by the First Amendment unless the speech causes a "substantial disruption" to the learning environment.

  9. Kennedy v. Bremerton School District - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennedy_v._Bremerton...

    Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, 597 U.S. 507 (2022), is a landmark decision [1] by the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held, 6–3, that the government, while following the Establishment Clause, may not suppress an individual from engaging in personal religious observance, as doing so would violate the Free Speech and Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment.