Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Negotiation is a strategic discussion that resolves an issue in a way that both parties find acceptable. Individuals should make separate, interactive decisions; and negotiation analysis considers how groups of reasonably bright individuals should and could make joint, collaborative decisions. These theories are interleaved and should be ...
Anatol Rapoport's 1960 book Fights, Games, and Debates described three persuasive strategies that could be applied in debates. [11] He noted that they correspond to three kinds of psychotherapy or ways of changing people, [12] and he named them after Pavlov (behaviorism), Freud (psychoanalysis), and Rogers (person-centered therapy).
In negotiation, consistency, or the consistency principle, refers to a negotiator's strong psychological need to be consistent with prior acts and statements. The consistency principle states that people are motivated toward cognitive consistency and will change their attitudes, beliefs, perceptions and actions to achieve it. [1]
The process of offer and counteroffer results in a mutually beneficial arrangement. However, multiple studies have shown that initial offers have a stronger influence on the outcome of negotiations than subsequent counteroffers. [69] An example of the power of anchoring has been conducted during the Strategic Negotiation Process Workshops.
Argumentation includes various forms of dialogue such as deliberation and negotiation which are concerned with collaborative decision-making procedures. [3] It also encompasses eristic dialog, the branch of social debate in which victory over an opponent is the primary goal, and didactic dialogue used for teaching. [2]
Good cop, bad cop, also informally called the Mutt and Jeff technique, [1] is a psychological tactic used in interrogation and negotiation, in which a team of two people take opposing approaches to the subject. [2]
It is possible for both types of negotiation to be unethical. [30]: 145 Instead, it is ethical for a lawyer to be able to adjust negotiation strategies to provide effective advocacy for a client. [30]: 154–155 The need for flexibility in negotiation styles was echoed in a 2015 paper calling principled negotiations a "false promise". [31]
In the social sciences, bargaining or haggling is a type of negotiation in which the buyer and seller of a good or service debate the price or nature of a transaction. If the bargaining produces agreement on terms, the transaction takes place. It is often commonplace in poorer countries, or poorer localities within any specific country.