Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A patent caveat was an official notice of intention to file a patent application at a later date. A caveat expired after one year, but could be renewed by paying an annual fee of $10. [2] [3] Caveats were similar to provisional applications used today in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) which also expire after one year ...
Generally, caveat emptor is the contract law principle that controls the sale of real property after the date of closing, but may also apply to sales of other goods. The phrase caveat emptor and its use as a disclaimer of warranties arises from the fact that buyers typically have less information than the seller about the good or service they ...
Caveat is Latin for "beware". [1] In Australian property law and other jurisdictions using the Torrens title system, a caveat is a warning that someone other than the owner claims some right over or nonregistered interest in the property .
The court can order costs against an applicant using a caveat for that purpose. [30] To challenge the caveat, the intended executor sends a completed "warning" form to the probate registry. This document will be sent to the person who entered the caveat, and for the caveat to remain, they will have to enter an appearance at the probate registry ...
A continuing patent application is a patent application that follows, and claims priority to, an earlier-filed patent application. According to United States patent law, a continuing application is a continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part application filed under the conditions specified in 35 U.S.C. §§ 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c ...
But there’s a big caveat here. Most insurance providers classify anti-obesity medications as “cosmetic drugs.” ... You might also be able to apply for manufacturer savings programs — more ...
RESTRICTED: Distribution to non-US citizens or those holding an interim clearance is prohibited; certain other special handling procedures apply. FISA: is used in FISC [77] and probably in FISCR since at least 2017. [78] Classification level and caveats are typically separated by "//" in the summary classification marking.
On February 19, Zenas Fisk Wilber, the patent examiner for both Bell's application and Gray's caveat, noticed that Bell's application claimed the same variable resistance feature described in Gray's caveat, and both described an invention for "transmitting vocal sounds". Wilber suspended Bell's application for 3 months to allow Gray to file a ...