enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Correlation does not imply causation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply...

    The above example commits the correlation-implies-causation fallacy, as it prematurely concludes that sleeping with one's shoes on causes headache. A more plausible explanation is that both are caused by a third factor, in this case going to bed drunk, which thereby gives rise to a correlation. So the conclusion is false. Example 2

  3. Misuse of statistics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misuse_of_statistics

    When a statistical test shows a correlation between A and B, there are usually six possibilities: A causes B. B causes A. A and B both partly cause each other. A and B are both caused by a third factor, C. B is caused by C which is correlated to A. The observed correlation was due purely to chance.

  4. Questionable cause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Questionable_cause

    Therefore the sunny day causes me to score well on the test." Here is the example the two events may coincide or correlate, but have no causal connection. [2] Fallacies of questionable cause include: Circular cause and consequence [citation needed] Correlation implies causation (cum hoc, ergo propter hoc) Third-cause fallacy; Wrong direction

  5. Spurious relationship - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spurious_relationship

    Graphical model: Whereas a mediator is a factor in the causal chain (top), a confounder is a spurious factor incorrectly implying causation (bottom). In statistics, a spurious relationship or spurious correlation [1] [2] is a mathematical relationship in which two or more events or variables are associated but not causally related, due to either coincidence or the presence of a certain third ...

  6. List of fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

    Cum hoc ergo propter hoc (Latin for 'with this, therefore because of this'; correlation implies causation; faulty cause/effect, coincidental correlation, correlation without causation) – a faulty assumption that, because there is a correlation between two variables, one caused the other. [57]

  7. Magical thinking - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magical_thinking

    [1] [2] [3] Examples include the idea that personal thoughts can influence the external world without acting on them, or that objects must be causally connected if they resemble each other or have come into contact with each other in the past. [1] [2] [4] Magical thinking is a type of fallacious thinking and is a common source of invalid causal ...

  8. AOL

    search.aol.com

    The search engine that helps you find exactly what you're looking for. Find the most relevant information, video, images, and answers from all across the Web.

  9. Post hoc ergo propter hoc - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_hoc_ergo_propter_hoc

    Correlation does not imply causation – Refutation of a logical fallacy; Jumping to conclusions – Psychological term; Magical thinking – Belief in the connection of unrelated events; Superstition – Belief or behavior that is considered irrational or supernatural; Survivorship bias – Logical error, form of selection bias